Part of the openDemocracy Network

Sortition and public policy




A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.

Labour After Brown

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

NOT A DAY LONGER




What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

'The Great British Citizenship Pub Quiz'

28 - 09 - 2007
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Jon Bright (London, OK): I was hovering by the bar at the above named Manifesto Club night yesterday evening at Islington's Old Queens Head. The idea of the evening was rather a good one - to let people take the 'Citizenship Test', which must be passed by everyone wishing to become a British citizen, or apply for indefinite leave to remain. As we sat in the all new smoke free environs of the Queen's Head turret bar, fielding the Home Office's citizenship questions, two things became apparent.

The first was that the citizenship test makes for a cracking pub quiz. 24 multiple choice questions based on general knowledge about Britain, some easy, some guessable, some downright impossible - it was a perfect mix. What is the population of Wales? What is the role of a party whip? What type of constitution does the UK have? (should be able to get that one!). It was extremely entertaining.

The second was that it is a fiendishly difficult thing to pass. You needed 75% (or 18 correct) to get one of the certificates the Manifesto Club had specially printed for the occasion. In a room of over 50 100 people (many operating in teams) no-one was able to get the 18 required (I managed only 15 - and I must admit I've read the book it is based on). Everyone immediately started making the same chuckling joke about being thrown out of the country, but the club's point was made - if current British citizens can't pass the test, why should immigrants have to?

I'm sympathetic to this point of view (my failing grade gives me little other option). But I do think this test is slightly misinterpreted by most, the Manifesto Club included. It is NOT a barrier to entry - you can take the test as many times as you need to pass, up to once a week. It does cost money (£20 for the book, £34 a time for the test) - but when you compare this to the overall cost of emigrating to the UK, the % extra is relatively small. No-one at the Queens Head passed - but then again few people there had studied the book as you would if it mattered. Other factors being equal, I doubt this test has turned back many people who want to be British citizens.

What's the point of it then? I see it as something similar to a driving test. It's not a device to stop people from ever entering - but rather to make sure they have learnt specific bits of knowledge before they do. It's a tool of 'socialization' if you like, it goes hand in hand with citizenship lessons at school and citizenship ceremonies for new citizens. I'm not going to start quoting too much Foucault, but the neoliberal state has been becoming increasingly interventionist in more aspects of our lives and I see this as an intervention at the level of identity. It's a long way off the campaigns of thought reform Orwell depicted in 1984; but it's informed by the same principle. British identity, once so integral to the idea of Britain, is being stripped away - no-one knows what it means to be British any more. A new identity is needed to take its place, and the liberal model of citizenship is the only thing that can be found (see my post below).

Of course it's cackhanded, superficial: no-one thinks a 24 question test is going to turn everyone into model citizens. All attempts at top down identity construction are doomed to be laughed at in once smoky pubs. But I see it as the beginning of a trend: what will be really interesting is what this test looks like in twenty years time, and what else comes with it, because the problem it is trying to tackle won't go away.

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
by ourkingdom (not verified)
by candace (not verified)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options