Part of the openDemocracy Network

Sortition and public policy




A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.

Labour After Brown

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

NOT A DAY LONGER




What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Should Britain trade with Saudi Arabia?

30 - 10 - 2007
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Jon Bright (London, OK): I've just come from a CentreForum event advertising the launch of their new pamphlet: 'Globalisation: a liberal response'. Samuel Brittan and Vince Cable were on hand to fly the flag for free markets (with safeguards), relaxed immigration laws and the end to notions of 'reciprocity' in trade negotiations. Brittan was all for allowing Polish plumbers in to London - we need to find what to export back in which we have a comparative advantage, he said, and that was for the market to decide.

Cable was free to attend because he is boycotting the state visit of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia - a visit which, coincidentally, appeared to be taking place right outside the window (a band could be heard marching past as Cable himself was speaking). His boycott, if I need to tell you, was over the regime's record of human rights abuses, and also the row of alleged corruption in the al-Yamamah arms deal.

Is support of free trade compatible with this type of 'moral foreign policy' approach? Cable, as far as I'm aware, does not want us to break off trade relations with Saudi Arabia. He simply doesn't want us to go out of our way by 'honouring' King Abdullah with a state visit. Which is fine - but one of the main purposes of visits such as this is to strengthen relations, particularly trade relations. Receiving heads of state is part and parcel of a globalised world, it's part of doing trade well.

I have always been for the idea that we should be bringing people in rather than making them pariahs (I was pro giving China the 2008 Olympics, for example) but I can also see why Cable might not want to have to glad hand someone who presides over a state where women aren't allowed to drive. Has he found a nuanced middle ground which preserves some principle in an imperfect world? Or is his position tantamount to the idea that we should trade with Saudi Arabia, we just shouldn't be very good at it? Do we need a moral trade policy? No easy answers - as always other opinions are welcome...

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Liberalism between the economic and political &laqu (not verified) said:

Fri, 2007-11-02 15:30

[...] This is an article partly in response and stimulated by Jon Bright’s insightful blog entry below. The launch of CentreForum’s pamphlet, ‘Globalisation: a liberal response‘, provided [...]

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

In Pictures


Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future