
A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.
Part of the openDemocracy Network
Sortition and public policyLabour After BrownFrom Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism. Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity. Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government. A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights. Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour. NOT A DAY LONGER
England Awakes?England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart Just Commented
OK is reading
Email AlertsFill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).
OurKingdom TagsNavigation |
The World
Just Posted
They say about OK"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia "See OurKingdom to keep up" South Belfast Diary "...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..." Peter Oborne "...becoming a daily read for me." Iain Dale "To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..." Matthew d'Ancona "Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona." The Wardman Wire "Fast becoming the best political website around" Tom Waterhouse, CEP "...attracting energy from a range of contributors." thenextwave "...looks very promising..." The England Project "The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..." The Green Ribbon "On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom" Andreas Whittam-Smith "thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)" Nostalgia For the Future |
Trust and the war on terrorJon Bright (London, OK): Heard this radio ad yesterday which I had to put a post up on. [audio http://www.met.police.uk/so/docs/ct.mp3] It's from the Met's "Trust your instincts" campaign - they are asking members of the public to phone a confidential hotline if they see any suspicious behaviour. We are asked: "How d’you tell the difference between someone just video-ing crowded place and someone who’s checking it out for a terrorist attack?" Answer - you don't have to, the Met will do it for you. "Trust your instincts: not each other" is the slogan that could have been. You can see their point, of course - while we still, thankfully, live in an age without overarching surveillance, public tip-offs are an extremely important part of the counter terrorist operation. I'm certainly not suggesting people shouldn't phone the police if they genuinely think someone is building a bomb. But I also think this kind of advert, phrased in its casual, offhand manner, is only going to contribute to the general "atmosphere" of the war on terror - a low grade, residual fear, where everyone is a suspect and enemy is genuinely indistinguishable from friend. Can such an atmosphere, once created, ever truly be removed from a society? Or will we be living with adverts like this for the forseeable future - and with what consequences for much vaunted exercises building "community cohesion" and Putnam's vanished "social capital" ? PS: Sunny Hundal posts on this on Liberal Conspiracy and adds a witty picture.
by Gavin Whenman (not verified)
Time we started calling by Stephen Taylor (not verified)
Post new comment |