
A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.
Part of the openDemocracy Network
Sortition and public policyLabour After BrownFrom Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism. Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity. Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government. A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights. Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour. NOT A DAY LONGER
England Awakes?England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart OurKingdom TagsNavigation |
Sham DemocracyAnthony Barnett (London, OK): Iain Dale has just written a striking lament about the disgrace of sham consultations. Those who succeed in getting elected as MPs can feel like this too, and we know what it is like for the rest of us. It raises the question of who takes decisions and how they do so - leaving aside why. In part it is the hypocrisy of the process that is so galling. It would be much better with planning decisions if those in authority said: "We want to take this decision, for this reason, to achieve this objective, we know that these people will not like it, we are proposing this compensation and now we are having a consultation in which we will listen especially to those who can suggest a better way of achieving our aim by other means." Instead, we get the evasions, dishonesty, and distortions that drive people to direct action. See Katrina Forrester's post in OK about the Plane Stupid demo on the roof of the Commons after the "consultation" on the Heathrow third runway which did not allow members of the public to let it be known if they were against it. Which, as she puts it, shows, "the extent to which Government strives to keep people impotent". Post new comment |
Just Posted
Just Commented
Email AlertsFill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).
OK is reading
They say about OK"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia "See OurKingdom to keep up" South Belfast Diary "...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..." Peter Oborne "...becoming a daily read for me." Iain Dale "To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..." Matthew d'Ancona "Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona." The Wardman Wire "Fast becoming the best political website around" Tom Waterhouse, CEP "...attracting energy from a range of contributors." thenextwave "...looks very promising..." The England Project "The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..." The Green Ribbon "On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom" Andreas Whittam-Smith "thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)" Nostalgia For the Future |
ourkingdom (not verified) said:
Sat, 2008-03-29 13:41Simon Heywood has just posted this relevant comment on Katrina's post
"It is a stitch-up sure enough. The only way to air an issue is to stage an eye-catching protest, but if you stage an eye-catching protest, the protest, not the issue, becomes the story. There won’t usually be much media debate about why the protest is happening. In Derby, an anti-Trident protest outside Rolls Royce (who make Trident parts) was reported by the BBC in terms of public order, risk of violence (!), etc. - literally not a word about why Trident might not be a good idea - a typical example."