Part of the openDemocracy Network

Sortition and public policy




A major new series from Imprint Academic on the use of randomisation in education, politics and other public policy areas. Special discount prices for OurKingdom and openDemocracy readers.

Labour After Brown

From Milibland to Johnson land?: Jeremy Gilbert argues for Labour without neo-liberalism.

Magical thinking on Britishness: Anthony Barnett critiques Liam Byrne on fraternity.

Rule of law at risk: Geoffrey Bindman calls for a turn away from the marketisation of government.

A new Bill of Rights for Britain?: Guy Aitchison analyses Parliament's proposed new Bill of Rights.

Miliband - by our rights we will know you: Claire O'Brien puts forward a new progressive vision for Labour.

Recapturing liberal Britain: David Marquand challenges Labour's constitutional orthodoxy.

Miliband and the Liberal Democrats: James Graham on the case for realignment.

What is Labour's British story?: Writing from Scotland, Gerry Hassan widens the OurKingdom debate on Labour's future.

This is not Brown's crisis but Britain's: David Marquand says social democracy is bust and Britain may be too.

The Challenges for Miliband's Progressive Fusion: Fabian Society head Sunder Katwala responds to David Miliband.

NOT A DAY LONGER




What do we do now?: Anthony Barnett assesses the stakes for for liberals and radicals in David Davis's campaign against the erosion of rights and liberties


The Abundance of Caution: an authoritative essay by Anthony Barnett sets out the case against 42 Days

England Awakes?

England, Britain and multiculturalism: an OurKingdom exchange

A mild awakening?, England's turn? by David Goodhart

delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Syndicate content

Good Friday 10 years on: Jonathan Powell on the peace process

10 - 04 - 2008
delicious | digg | reddit | newsvine | furl | google | yahoo | technorati | diigolet

Tom Griffin reviews Great Hatred, Little Room: Making Peace in Northern Ireland by Jonathan Powell.

Powell's book sheds light on the political manoeuvrings of the peace process and draws out important lessons we have yet to learn.

As Tony Blair's Chief of Staff, former diplomat Jonathan Powell was a key backroom player in the Northern Ireland peace process for a decade. In this book, he provides a good-humoured and magnanimous account of an epic series of negotiations that began in the run-up to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and lasted into the aftermath of the 2006 St Andrews deal.

For much of the time, Powell's role was seen to be more important than that of the Northern Ireland Secretary, and he admits to tensions with Mo Mowlam and Peter Mandelson in particular.

Like Blair himself, Powell has Irish antecedents. In a potted history of Ireland in Chapter Two, we learn that a great-grandfather had to leave Ireland because he was suspected of being a Fenian, and that Charles Parnell's mistress Kitty O'Shea was a distant relative. Nevertheless, like his boss, Powell came to the issue light on political baggage.

Powell's departmental background may be more significant. The Foreign Office's 'friends' in the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) helped pave the way for the peace process through a back-channel of secret contacts with the IRA that lasted from the early 1970s to the 1990s.

Together with Peter Taylor's documentary, The Secret Peacemaker, Powell's book reveals important new details about this link, not least the role of Derry businessman Brendan Duddy, who set up a crucial meeting between MI6's Michael Oatley and Martin McGuinness in 1991.

This sparked something of a turf-war with Stella Rimington, who insisted that the Security Service (MI5) take control of the back-channel. Powell maintains that all branches of the security forces were firmly behind the political process, although he acknowledges debates with the Army over demilitarisation, and frequent leaks of police intelligence to the unionists.

On occasion he passes over details that might lead one to question that benign picture. He notes the murder of Denis Donaldson, "a Sinn Féin employee who had been caught up in the Stormontgate Affair," but ignores Donaldson's exposure as an informer.

This discretion contrasts with Powell's candour in relation to the political parties. As journalist Liam Clarke has noted, there are major embarrassments for both the DUP and Sinn Féin in this book.

Powell reports secret back-channel contacts between the two in 2004, at a time when the DUP would not publicly sit in the same room as Sinn Féin for negotiations. He also claims that Martin McGuinness told him that the British Government need not have conceded the Bloody Sunday Inquiry. On this account, it was the SDLP and the Irish Government that were pushing most strongly for investigations into cases like that of Pat Finucane.

Powell accepts the charge that the British Government sought to build the process from the extremes rather than from the centre, but one wonders whether his evidence bears this out. Downing Street was the last major player to accept David Trimble's eclipse as the leader of unionism by Ian Paisley.

in his conclusion, Powell rejects Seamus Mallon's famous claim that the Good Friday Agreement was "Sunningdale for slow learners," arguing that "there were underlying factors necessary for peace which were not present in the 1970s." This is a sound judgement, albeit not necessarily incompatible with Mallon's thesis.

Much interest has rightly centered on Powell's suggestion that the search for peace can succeed "in the Middle East, in Afghanistan, and even, in the longer term, with Islamic terrorism, if people are prepared to talk."

There is some evidence that the British Government has attempted to apply this logic. An MI6 veteran of the Irish contacts, Alistair Crooke, turned up in Jerusalem a few years ago running a back-channel to Hamas.

There were also rumours of an MI6 back-channel to the Taliban several months ago, when two Irishmen were expelled from Afghanistan. It may be significant that the British ambassador there, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, began his career on the Foreign Office Irish desk.

The value of such contacts has been the subject of a lively debate, which is perhaps best encapsulated by two think-tanks on either side of it, Conflicts Forum and Policy Exchange.

The chairman of the latter, Charles Moore, delivered a stinging critique of Powell in the Telegraph last week:

The Northern Ireland experience is now being turned into Britain's greatest policy export since privatisation. It is offered as the world model for conflict resolution.

Problems in the Middle East? Treat Hamas as Tony Blair treated Sinn Fein. Iraq proving a bit awkward? Treat Iran like the Irish Republic - a friendly neighbour who can help broker a deal.

Last week, even dreary Des Browne, our Defence Secretary, caught up with the fashion and told this paper that he would like a chat with the Taliban. Al-Qa'eda next?

Moore laments the destruction of the moderate parties, but fails to acknowledge that many of the measures he objects to were SDLP demands as much as, or more than, Sinn Féin demands. The moderate alternative he hankers after never existed.

Such criticisms are not new, as Powell shows in a passage on the 1998 Good Friday referendum:

Tony spoke to Conrad Black to try and get the Daily Telegraph, the only British paper read by unionists and virulently anti-Agreement, to be more moderate, which was only partly successful since what Black used to call "the militant tendency" on the paper stuck obstinately to their attempts to undermine the Agreement.

It is a pity that David Trimble has largely accepted the analysis of those who were undermining him then, in the process under-playing his own achievement.

Those who were wrong about the possibility of an inclusive peace in Northern Ireland are not the best people to judge its significance for other conflicts.

On this key point, Powell is in the right, and that makes this book both timely and significant far beyond Ireland.

(Powell, Bodley Head, March 2008, 352pp)

 

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><b> <i> <br> <p> <div> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
More information about formatting options

In Pictures


Email Alerts

Fill in the form below to sign up to our automatic daily alerts, or weekly editorial summary (you will be taken to another page to confirm which options you want).

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

They say about OK

"the ever-stimulating OpenDemocracy"
Ekklesia

"See OurKingdom to keep up"
South Belfast Diary

"...an essential guide to understanding the dynamic constitutional situation..."
Peter Oborne

"...becoming a daily read for me."
Iain Dale

"To make sense of it all, check out OurKingdom..."
Matthew d'Ancona

"Worth a look...it is, however, recommended by Matthew d'Ancona."
The Wardman Wire

"Fast becoming the best political website around"
Tom Waterhouse, CEP

"...attracting energy from a range of contributors."
thenextwave

"...looks very promising..."
The England Project

"The excellent new OurKingdom blog from OpenDemocracy..."
The Green Ribbon

"On the internet, I keep in touch with openDemocracy, a website on global current affairs, and its useful offshoot, OurKingdom"
Andreas Whittam-Smith

"thanks to the fine folk at OurKingdom, (who manage to communicate a variety of perspectives in the way that only a decent group blog can)"
Nostalgia For the Future